Hung out to dry – the Citipointe saga

Hung out to dry – the Citipointe saga

  • February 4, 2022

This week, Citipointe Christian College was the centre of a mini publicity maelstrom. In less than a week, the Brisbane Christian school first released and then hastily retracted its enrolment contract with parents after receiving a tsunami of outrage from activists, journalists and a small fringe of disaffected school stakeholders. Citipointe’s crime? It had included in its contract clear and unambiguous statements of orthodox Christian doctrines about sexual orientation and gender identity that are part of its wider orthodox Christian beliefs. In short, a Christian school had the courage and honesty to set out its clear doctrines and its intention to faithfully uphold those teachings in its school and then sent that to parents.

Amidst a flurry of pejorative press, journalists, politicians and commentariat screeched “Citipointe is discriminating against gay kids”.

Here is the thing. It’s not about gay kids.

Even though many hand-wringing and well-meaning Christians have tried desperately to breathe life into this straw man by engaging with it in opinion and commentary, the real issue is Christian doctrine. The kids are a Trojan horse. Citipointe has never expelled a child with same-sex attraction or a child with identity confusion, nor has any other Christian school. Indeed, Christian schools are one of the last places that vulnerable children are safe from society’s bombardment of children with hyper-sexualised teaching and unscientific identity theory.

The Citipointe saga is about an unrelenting attack on Christian teachings on sexuality and identity that are in the crossfire of a powerful anti-Christian activist lobby. After the tanks have rolled over Citipointe, they will aim their guns at the nuanced and wise Christian organisations who hold to an orthodox Biblical position on sexuality.

The rights of parents and religious communities to educate their children in accordance with their deeply held beliefs is a fundamental plank in the internationally recognised right to freedom of religious belief and activity in Article 18 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights:

  1. Everyone shall have the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion. This right shall include freedom to have or to adopt a religion or belief of his choice, and freedom, either individually or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in worship, observance, practice and teaching.
  2. No one shall be subject to coercion which would impair his freedom to have or to adopt a religion or belief of his choice.
  3. Freedom to manifest one’s religion or beliefs may be subject only to such limitations as are prescribed by law and are necessary to protect public safety, order, health, or morals or the fundamental rights and freedoms of others.
  4. The States Parties to the present Covenant undertake to have respect for the liberty of parents and, when applicable, legal guardians to ensure the religious and moral education of their children in conformity with their own convictions.

As Article 18 demonstrates, freedom of religious belief and activity is a unique human right. It is an individual right because religious belief is a matter of an individual’s personal conscience. However, it is also a communal right because individuals express their motivating religious conscience by coming together and forming religious communities. The international standards for limiting religious activity are extremely high, with the interpretive Siracusa Principles stating that religious activity is a non-derogable right – meaning that the right to freedom of religious belief is absolute and the right to freedom of religious activity is only to be limited in the most extreme of circumstances, such as when it is necessary to protect public safety and order.

If religious freedom is to be properly protected in Australia, religious communities need to be able to come together and publicly form schools like Citipointe to educate their children. If they can’t, then religious freedom will only be a second-tier right in Australia, at best.

Religious education is more than just imparting facts and curriculum content. It’s about faith communities coming together to provide an authentic faith-based education and educational environment where every aspect reflects and models the faith of the community. It’s up to parents and students to choose to join Citipointe’s Christian community – no one is forcing them to.

The only place where Citipointe’s Article 18(4) ICCPR rights are in any way effectively protected at law in Australia is in section 38 of the Sex Discrimination Act 1984 (Cth). This important balancing protection for religious freedom rights recognises that when schools like Citipointe conduct their school in accordance with their doctrines, tenets and beliefs they are not discriminating, but exercising their right to freedom of religious belief and activity.

Professor Neil Foster provides an excellent summary of the legal issues at play for Citipointe in his Law and Religion blog. Professor Foster points out that QLD law does not provide protection for Citipointe in the way that the SDA does, and neither will the much discussed Religious Discrimination Bill (if it is passed in its current form).

Citipointe’s maligned and now withdrawn enrolment contract obviously was not meant to “contract out of” the application of anti-discrimination laws as some critics have suggested. The contract was targeted at giving it the best possible footing for relying on protections in the SDA . Citipointe acted proactively and in response to the unrelenting pressure and the spectre of activist intrusion into their school.

Citipointe school withdrew its enrolment contract after intense public pressure. This is a blow for religious freedom. No one was forcing parents to sign the contract, it was a transparent statement of the school’s beliefs and what it means to be part of the school community. The activists who shouted down Citipointe want Christian schools to change and conform to the fashionable ideologies of the day.

If we want Australia to be a flourishing democracy, we need to respect fundamental religious freedom rights and allow space for Christian schools to ensure vulnerable children are given a safe space away from sexualisation and damaging ideology. A confident and diverse pluralism is not just good for Christian schools. It is good for Australian society.

RELATED articles

Slouching Towards Uncertain Justice: HRLA, Israel Folau and Freedom of Speech

3RD MAY, 2019

The year of our Lord two thousand and nineteen in Australia has so far been a fertile year for the public profile of the fundamental right of freedom of religion for Christians to manifest their…

GoFundMe has set itself up as a judge, jury and executioner

22ND AUGUST, 2019

Published in The Sydney Morning Herald on 24/06/2019 GoFundMe’s abrupt shutdown of Israel Folau’s fundraising page yesterday for “violation of… terms of service” is a troubling development for his religious freedom case and has disturbing implications for…

Folau’s prospects bolstered by landmark religious freedom ruling in Britain

22ND AUGUST, 2019

Published in The Sydney Morning Herald on 04/07/2019 Britain’s second highest Court handed down a decision on religious freedom that will send chills down the collective spine of Rugby Australia. In contrast, Israel Folau and his team…

Religious Discrimination Bill Submission


HRLA Submission to the Attorney-General on the Exposure Draft of the Religious Discrimination Bill. The Human Rights Law Alliance has made a submission to the Attorney-General on the exposure draft of the Religious Discrimination Bill…

HRLA Successfully Defends a Queensland Mother from a Worthless Vilification Claim

1ST JULY, 2020

Homosexual Vilification Claim Dropped In a victory for free speech, the Human Rights Law Alliance has successfully assisted Queensland mother-of-four and photographer, Katrina Tait, to defeat an LGBT activist’s vilification claim. What started as an…

Australian Religious Freedom Cases

10TH JULY, 2020

Australian Cases – Religious Freedom Religious freedom is under threat in Australia with Christians and people of other faiths facing increasing hostility in the workplace and in the public square. HRLA has put together a…

State Governments Move to Ban ‘Conversion Therapy’

17TH JULY, 2020

Gay ‘conversion therapy’ laws are a bad idea. South Australian Shadow Minister for Human Services Nat Cook recently announced that she is drafting legislation to outlaw ‘conversion therapy’ practices that are targeted at the LGBTQI…

Mark Latham Moves to Uphold Parental Rights

7TH AUGUST, 2020

This week, the Hon. Mark Latham MLC moved to restore parental rights in NSW. His Education Legislation Amendment (Parental Rights) Bill 2020 will give control back to parents over the moral and ethical education of…

The process as punishment: The misuse of vilification laws

21ST AUGUST, 2020

The Human Rights Law Alliance is acting for Lyle Shelton in relation to a vilification complaint brought against him by two drag queens. This piece explains the basic substance of the complaint against Lyle and why…

Vilification Laws Misused to Attack Free Speech


What do you think about ‘cancel-culture’? A healthy liberal democratic society requires freedom to exchange ideas and beliefs and to participate in public debate. A society that lacks such freedoms will not last for long….


Subscribe to our newsletter

as we work towards better legal protections for freedom of conscience and religion for all Australians