Religious Freedom Needs an Effective Religious Discrimination Bill
- September 10, 2021
Opponents of the Religious Discrimination Bill are mounting a concerted campaign and moving another line of attack against the long-awaited piece of legislation. The Attorney General and the Coalition Government have been signalling to faith communities that they need to lower their expectations after opponents of the RDB have called for removal of protections for reasonable religious speech (the so-called “Folau clause”) that were included in the first and second draft of the Bill circulated in 2019. If Attorney General Cash backpedals on this key protection, it will leave many religious Australians vulnerable who are subject to employer overreach into how they express their faith in their own personal time.
Religious freedom has been on the agenda since 2017 at the time of the same sex marriage postal vote. The Ruddock Religious Freedom Review in 2018 identified that religious freedoms are inadequately protected in Australian law and recommended the Federal Government enact an RDB. However, it was Rugby Australia’s sacking Israel Folau in 2019 for posting a Bible verse meme on Instagram that poured fuel on the fire and made every Australian sit up and take notice. For most Australians, what happened to Folau did not pass the sniff test. Should an employer be able to police a religious employee’s speech outside of work?
When the first draft of the RDB was released, it included a clause that would prevent employers from restricting reasonable religious speech outside of work. RDB opponents say that this privileges religious belief and goes beyond ‘traditional’ anti-discrimination legislation. According to RDB opponents, an employer should be able to punish an employee for what they say in their own time.
HRLA regularly works with clients who need real protections from overreach by employers into their conduct outside of work. This is not just an issue for Israel Folau, it is an issue for thousands of religious Australians who want the same freedoms as every other group to share their religious views and express their beliefs in their own time. Australian law only provides patchwork protection for religious communities. State-based anti-discrimination laws don’t protect religious belief at all in some states like NSW. To better understand why an RDB that protects personal speech rights is so important, here are some HRLA cases that could have been helped by an effective Religious Discrimination Act. There are plenty more examples of cases on our website.
Case 1 – Ian Shepherd the teacher who was investigated for his social media posts
Ian is a teacher in the Northern Territory who was targeted by activists over his private social media posts. The Department of Education launched an investigation into Ian’s private social media use, and he almost lost his job. The Department dropped the investigation after HRLA helped Ian. Just like Israel Folau, a Religious Discrimination Act could have protected Ian’s expression of his religious beliefs outside the workplace.
Watch Ian talk about his ordeal here.
Case 2 – Max the teacher who was fired over his transgender convictions
Max is an experienced teacher in NSW who was suspended and then fired for his Christian transgender convictions. Religious beliefs are not protected in NSW, which gave Max limited options. With the help of HRLA, a favourable settlement was reached. A Religious Discrimination Act could have protected Max both inside and outside work when he spoke up about his religious beliefs.
Read Max’s story here.
To be effective the RDB must protect the religious rights of people like Ian and Max. An RDB that doesn’t protect workers’ expression of their religious beliefs outside the workplace will be of limited use.
The Coalition Government went to the election saying that they would introduce a religious Discrimination Bill that will protect religious Australians from discrimination. Religious communities don’t want a rubber stamp on a hollow promise.
The Government must maintain its course on delivering an effective RDB and not bow to pressure from anti-religious opponents who would rather see the RDB fail completely than give religious Australians equal protection under the law.
3RD MAY, 2019
The year of our Lord two thousand and nineteen in Australia has so far been a fertile year for the public profile of the fundamental right of freedom of religion for Christians to manifest their…SEE MORE
22ND AUGUST, 2019
Published in The Sydney Morning Herald on 24/06/2019 GoFundMe’s abrupt shutdown of Israel Folau’s fundraising page yesterday for “violation of… terms of service” is a troubling development for his religious freedom case and has disturbing implications for…SEE MORE
22ND AUGUST, 2019
Published in The Sydney Morning Herald on 04/07/2019 Britain’s second highest Court handed down a decision on religious freedom that will send chills down the collective spine of Rugby Australia. In contrast, Israel Folau and his team…SEE MORE
4TH OCTOBER, 2019
HRLA Submission to the Attorney-General on the Exposure Draft of the Religious Discrimination Bill. The Human Rights Law Alliance has made a submission to the Attorney-General on the exposure draft of the Religious Discrimination Bill…SEE MORE
1ST JULY, 2020
Homosexual Vilification Claim Dropped In a victory for free speech, the Human Rights Law Alliance has successfully assisted Queensland mother-of-four and photographer, Katrina Tait, to defeat an LGBT activist’s vilification claim. What started as an…SEE MORE
17TH JULY, 2020
Gay ‘conversion therapy’ laws are a bad idea. South Australian Shadow Minister for Human Services Nat Cook recently announced that she is drafting legislation to outlaw ‘conversion therapy’ practices that are targeted at the LGBTQI…SEE MORE
21ST AUGUST, 2020
The Human Rights Law Alliance is acting for Lyle Shelton in relation to a vilification complaint brought against him by two drag queens. This piece explains the basic substance of the complaint against Lyle and why…SEE MORE
25TH SEPTEMBER, 2020
What do you think about ‘cancel-culture’? A healthy liberal democratic society requires freedom to exchange ideas and beliefs and to participate in public debate. A society that lacks such freedoms will not last for long….SEE MORE
Subscribe to our newsletter
as we work towards better legal protections for freedom of conscience and religion for all Australians