Victorian Conversion Bill an unparalleled threat to religious freedom
- January 22, 2021
As 2021 begins, we observe the onward march of a Bill introduced in Victoria late last year to outlaw what the Victorian Premier has described as “cruel and bigoted practices that seek to change or suppress a person’s sexual orientation or gender identity”.
As of the date of this newsletter, the Change or Suppression (Conversion) Practices Prohibition Bill 2020 has been approved by the Legislative Assembly and will move to the Legislative Council in early 2021 for a Second Reading. If significant challenges to the Bill are not raised in its Second Reading, the Bill is all set to become law in Victoria within the next month or so.
HRLA has addressed many of the threats to religious freedom in our legal analysis in a previous newsletter which we develop further below.
The Bill threatens Christian sexual ethics
The Bill purportedly targets long-abandoned invasive and coercive historical clinical treatments to treat sexual attraction. Analysis of the Bill reveals that it will ban such a broad range of conduct that it will threaten any individual who teaches or advocates traditional Christian convictions about sexual identity and conduct.
In fact, the definition of banned practices explicitly targets religious practices and specifically includes prayer as a practice that could lead to sanction. It does not matter if the conduct was requested, or if a person benefits from it – that conduct will be prohibited.
The Bill is so broad that it will prevent real people to get real help for issues of sexuality and gender. Free to Change has conducted a study which documents the experiences of 78 member of the LGBT community who report changed lives and long-term benefits from secular and religious assistance with unwanted sexual attraction and gender dysphoria. This Bill would ban consensual treatments and services that these people have found helpful.
The Bill has major flaws that require significant amendment. The Institute for Civil Society has published a discussion paper outlining the key failings of the Bill, its background and proposed amendments that would remedy or mitigate some of the Bill’s flaws.
Associate Professor of Law, Neil Foster has written several articles on the fact that this is a bad Bill and analysing the dangers of the Bill.
This Bill is a serious threat to personal and religious freedom and could result in serious civil and criminal penalties for the teaching, expression, and promulgation of Biblical sexual ethics. Some of the more prominent elements of the Bill are:
- A person who engages in a banned practice could face prison for up to 10 years and/or receive a fine of up to $200,000.00.
- The Bill criminalises a person who engages in a banned practice, but also a person who refers someone to somebody who engages in such a practice.
- The Bill extends to online practices including social media activity, blogs and online audio-visual content, and applies outside of Victoria if they affect someone in Victoria.
- The Bill grants broad powers and authority to the Equal Opportunity and Human Rights Commission of Victoria to open and pursue investigations into anyone the Commission suspects of being involved in practices of this sort, whether organisations, churches or individuals. Complaints can be made anonymously and can be investigated under strict secrecy, subjecting the person under investigation to a costly, stressful and time-consuming process of litigation without ever being given the opportunity to confront or learn the identity of their accuser.
What You Can Do
Victorians concerned about the Bill should make their voice heard with members of the Legislative Chamber urging that this Bill is fundamentally flawed and that it must not be passed without sensible amendments. Amendments that have been put forward by the Institute for Civil Society will be useful. Stories from Free to Change are also powerful tools. In addition, the Australian Christian Lobby has formulated some options for action here.
As in all things, it is also important to pray that the Bill is defeated or that it is amended to remove the clear threat to religious freedom.
3RD MAY, 2019
The year of our Lord two thousand and nineteen in Australia has so far been a fertile year for the public profile of the fundamental right of freedom of religion for Christians to manifest their…SEE MORE
22ND AUGUST, 2019
Published in The Sydney Morning Herald on 24/06/2019 GoFundMe’s abrupt shutdown of Israel Folau’s fundraising page yesterday for “violation of… terms of service” is a troubling development for his religious freedom case and has disturbing implications for…SEE MORE
22ND AUGUST, 2019
Published in The Sydney Morning Herald on 04/07/2019 Britain’s second highest Court handed down a decision on religious freedom that will send chills down the collective spine of Rugby Australia. In contrast, Israel Folau and his team…SEE MORE
13TH SEPTEMBER, 2019
Two thousand and nineteen has been a fertile year for the profile of religious freedom in the public consciousness of Australia. In a manner that has not been seen for some time, the Bible and…SEE MORE
4TH OCTOBER, 2019
HRLA Submission to the Attorney-General on the Exposure Draft of the Religious Discrimination Bill. The Human Rights Law Alliance has made a submission to the Attorney-General on the exposure draft of the Religious Discrimination Bill…SEE MORE
1ST JULY, 2020
Homosexual Vilification Claim Dropped In a victory for free speech, the Human Rights Law Alliance has successfully assisted Queensland mother-of-four and photographer, Katrina Tait, to defeat an LGBT activist’s vilification claim. What started as an…SEE MORE
17TH JULY, 2020
Gay ‘conversion therapy’ laws are a bad idea. South Australian Shadow Minister for Human Services Nat Cook recently announced that she is drafting legislation to outlaw ‘conversion therapy’ practices that are targeted at the LGBTQI…SEE MORE
21ST AUGUST, 2020
The Human Rights Law Alliance is acting for Lyle Shelton in relation to a vilification complaint brought against him by two drag queens. This piece explains the basic substance of the complaint against Lyle and why…SEE MORE
Subscribe to our newsletter
as we work towards better legal protections for freedom of conscience and religion for all Australians